Two Worlds: Natural Law vs. Legal
- ziji dawa
- May 25
- 2 min read
Updated: Jun 3
The division between the natural and legal worlds is not merely philosophical - it manifests in practical ways that affect every aspect of our lives. To navigate these parallel realities effectively, we must first understand their distinct characteristics and how they interact.
The Natural World:
Exists independently of human belief or agreement
Operates through physical laws that are consistent and observable
Cannot be legislated or regulated into nonexistence
Rights in this world are inherent (ability to move, speak, think)
Consequences are direct and immediate
No paperwork required to exist
The Legal World:
Exists through collective agreement and enforcement
Operates through written codes, statutes, and regulations
Can be created or dissolved through legislative action
Rights in this world are granted and can be revoked
Consequences are indirect and procedural
Requires documentation to exist officially
Consider birth. In the natural world, a child simply exists upon being born. No documentation is required for the child to breathe, cry, or nurse. Yet in the legal world, this same child doesn’t “officially” exist until their birth is registered. Without this registration, the child - though obviously alive and present - is invisible to the legal system.
This pattern repeats throughout life:
Natural ability to travel vs. Legal permission to travel
Natural ability to build shelter vs. Legal permission to build
Natural ability to exchange goods vs. Legal permission to trade
Natural ability to heal vs. Legal permission to practice medicine
Natural ability to teach vs. Legal permission to educate
Understanding these parallel worlds reveals a crucial insight: the legal world can only restrict or permit what we can already naturally do. It creates no new abilities; it only regulates existing ones.
The legal world achieves its power through:
Control of access to societal resources
Threat of force against natural persons
Social conditioning and education
Economic incentives and penalties
Administrative procedures and requirements

Yet the legal world remains dependent on the natural world. Courts need physical buildings. Laws need physical enforcement. Money needs physical representation or electronic infrastructure. The legal world is always parasitic upon the natural world, never the reverse.
This relationship between worlds creates interesting paradoxes. A “legally homeless” person still exists in physical space. A business without proper licensing can still effectively trade goods. An “illegal immigrant” still physically exists within geographical boundaries.
The key to navigating both worlds successfully lies in:
Recognizing which world you’re operating in at any given moment
Understanding how the two worlds interact and influence each other
Maintaining awareness of the distinct rules governing each world
Knowing when and how to properly engage with each system
This understanding doesn’t mean rejecting the legal world - it means engaging with it consciously rather than unconsciously. It means recognizing that every legal construct is ultimately a tool, not a natural law.
The power of this knowledge lies not in resistance but in clarity. By understanding these parallel worlds, we can navigate them more effectively, make better decisions, and maintain our autonomy while still functioning within necessary systems while consciously making changes.
Comments